← All MPs
Sureena Brackenridge
Member of Parliament for Wolverhampton North East
LabourOfficial Source
Official record
- Role
- Member of Parliament for Wolverhampton North East
- Party
- Labour
- Contact
- Official contact page
Registered financial interests
2 entriesMoney, gifts, earnings and support this MP has declared in the official Register of Members' Financial Interests.
Gifts, benefits and hospitality from UK sources
- Name of donor: Premier League Address of donor: Brunel Building, 57 North Wharf Road, London W2 1HQ Amount of donation or nature and value if donation in kind: Two tickets for Premier League event, 'Inside Matters' Mental Health initiative, including Football match and hospitality, value £700 Date received: 17 May 2025 Date accepted: 17 May 2025 Donor status: company, registration 02719699 (Registered 10 June 2025)
Visits outside the UK
- Name of donor: The Coalition for Global Prosperity (CGP) Address of donor: 1 Horse Guards Avenue, London SW1A 2HU Estimate of the probable value (or amount of any donation): Flights (£1,303.66), accommodation (£938.80), local transport (£1,496.14), food, refreshments and miscellaneous (£306.53), value £4,045.13 Destination of visit: Kenya Dates of visit: 24 May 2026 to 29 May 2026 Purpose of visit: Cross-party visit to Kenya to engage with political, business and civil society stakeholders on shared UK-Kenya priorities. (Registered 1 July 2026)
Source: UK Parliament Register of Members' Financial Interests
Recent votes
How this MP voted in the most recent House of Commons divisions.
- Aye
- Draft Code of Practice on Electronic and Workplace Ballots for Statutory Trade Union BallotsAye
15 Jul 2026
- No
- No
- No
- Aye
- Aye
- Aye
- Aye
- No
- No
- No
- Draft Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England and Wales) (Amendment) Order 2026Aye
1 Jul 2026
- Aye
- Aye
Source: UK Parliament Commons divisions.
Coming next
Political donations and delivery against promises will be added to each MP's profile as the accountability graph is built out — every claim linked to its official source.
Is anything here wrong, out of date, or missing your reply? Everything we publish is multi-source and correctable.