← All MPs
Marsha De Cordova
Member of Parliament for Battersea
LabourOfficial Source
Official record
- Role
- Member of Parliament for Battersea
- Party
- Labour
- Contact
- Official contact page
Registered financial interests
3 entriesMoney, gifts, earnings and support this MP has declared in the official Register of Members' Financial Interests.
Employment and earnings
- Role, work or services: Being a member of a grants application panel Payer: Fight for Sight, 18 Mansell Street, London E1 8AA
Visits outside the UK
- Name of donor: International Agency for the Prevention of Blindness Address of donor: 50 Leman Street, London E1 8HQ Estimate of the probable value (or amount of any donation): Flights (3,616.03), accommodation and meals (£786.30), value £4,402.33 Destination of visit: Kenya Dates of visit: 2 June 2026 to 7 June 2026 Purpose of visit: To attend and deliver a keynote speech at IAPBs annual INSIGHT LIVE event - a conference bringing together hundreds of people from around the world - creating opportunities for collaboration, knowledge sharing and renewed commitment to advancing eye health (Registered 13 July 2026)
- Name of donor: Doha Forum Address of donor: Al Mirqab Tower, West Bay, Doha, State of Qatar Estimate of the probable value (or amount of any donation): Flights (£6,292.00) and accommodation (£399) Inclusive of meals, value £6,691 Destination of visit: Qatar (Doha) Dates of visit: 5 December 2025 to 8 December 2025 Purpose of visit: To attend the Doha Forum (Registered 30 December 2025)
Source: UK Parliament Register of Members' Financial Interests
Recent votes
How this MP voted in the most recent House of Commons divisions.
- Draft Code of Practice on Electronic and Workplace Ballots for Statutory Trade Union BallotsAye
15 Jul 2026
- Aye
- No
- No
- No
- No
- No
- No
- Aye
- Aye
- No
- No
- No
- No
- Aye
Source: UK Parliament Commons divisions.
Coming next
Political donations and delivery against promises will be added to each MP's profile as the accountability graph is built out — every claim linked to its official source.
Is anything here wrong, out of date, or missing your reply? Everything we publish is multi-source and correctable.